Newsroom
Beyond the search bar: Visibility in the AI era
Beyond the search bar: Visibility in the AI era
LLM visibility for brands: Insights and strategies for the AI era
Munich, 21/11/2025 – We are experiencing a quiet but profound paradigm shift: away from search engines and toward answer engines. When customers today ask ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude, “Which bike light is recommended?”, there is no results page anymore. Instead, a language model decides which brands, products, and sources appear in its answer. Companies are either part of that answer or gradually become invisible. LLM visibility refers to this new form of digital visibility: the presence of brands, content, and people in generative answers from large language models (LLMs).
What LLM visibility really means
Traditional SEO optimizes for ranking positions in search results. LLM visibility aims to ensure you appear in answers. This is more than “SEO+”: LLMs aggregate training data, live signals, and third-party context. They consider not only websites but also social media conversations, reviews, forum posts, video comments, and what are known as structured entities (a clearly defined, semantically recognizable unit, such as a person, brand, product, or topic, that search engines or AI models can understand as an independent object and connect with others). In short, the system crawls a large amount of web content and prioritizes credible, consistent, context-rich information.
Pointedly put: LLMs reward cross-channel, fact-driven communication and give lower weight to superficial content.
From upper funnel to revenue: Why this matters already
Today, LLMs have a particularly strong impact in the upper funnel: they are often the first touchpoint, and thus a strong brand-building asset. In projects, we see fewer direct website clicks but more implicit presence: being mentioned in an AI answer works like an authoritative recommendation. Brands that fail to appear may need to compensate through rising acquisition costs. Companies that have operated purely performance-driven until now and have built little “digital legacy” feel this impact first. Conversely, brands with strong identity, clear narrative guidance, and vibrant third-party signals benefit.
Three mechanisms driving LLM visibility
Presence in training data
LLMs are trained on enormous volumes of data. Brands that show up often and consistently in reputable, high-quality sources start with a clear advantage. However, outdated or misleading content may backfire: a years-old YouTube video full of negative feedback can easily overshadow today’s improvements and paint an unfair picture of what the brand actually delivers.
Retrieval omnipresence
Missing or new knowledge is supplemented via live search (“retrieval”). A “winner-takes-all” principle applies: only those who are currently visible and trustworthy are considered as sources. Third-party content, such as press, trade media, forums, and reviews, strengthens the likelihood of being mentioned in answers.
Semantics and structure instead of keywords
Entity-based writing replaces keyword lists. LLMs connect people, products, categories, and supporting evidence. The expanded E-E-A-T principle (experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trust) extends beyond your own website: consistency between owned and earned channels is decisive.
New basic rule: substantiate, don’t claim. Numbers, studies, cases — well-documented and consistent across all channels.
What changes in the channel mix
SEO remains important, as its own channel and as a feeder of LLM signals, but the visibility playing field is expanding: organic social, user-generated content (UGC), and reviews are gaining weight. At the same time, technical accessibility matters: LLM crawlers behave differently from Google. In technical audits, we see that weakly linked, dynamic, or restrictively configured website areas may fail to be picked up reliably by ChatGPT and others. Rethinking technical hygiene, therefore, becomes direct visibility work.
Industry landscape: Not who, but how
The question often arises whether specific industries are “naturally” favored or disadvantaged by LLMs. In reality, there is no inherent industry advantage or disadvantage. Differences stem instead from go-to-market patterns: consumer brands with strong historical brand building are currently ahead; performance-driven providers without earned content need to catch up. In regulated industries (e.g., healthcare), LLMs tend to weigh institutions more heavily, as third-party authorities are mandatory there.
Societal dimension: Three tasks ahead
LLMs change not only marketing and brand building, but they also how we as a society perceive, evaluate, and pass on information. When language models become the new gatekeepers of knowledge, visibility is no longer the only concern, as responsibility becomes central: What content trains the models, how transparent are their answers, and how capable are users of assessing them critically?
This leads to three core tasks:
- Transparency: Source citations are improving, but are still used too rarely. We need systems that clearly disclose evidence, and users who actually check it.
- Plurality: When content is curated by a handful of models, mainstream bias becomes a risk. Training data must be diverse; niche perspectives must not disappear.
- Media literacy: In a world where AI curates information, source criticism becomes a civic duty. Education systems, companies, and media should foster practical AI judgment skills.
Conclusion: From visibility to reliability
LLM visibility is not a hype label but the next competitive arena. Those who communicate with strong factual grounding, orchestrate third-party signals, and remove technical barriers will secure their place in answers — and with it attention, trust, and ultimately revenue. For companies, the key is translating their value proposition into consistent, reliable content to gain visibility in LLMs. This is the currency of the AI era.
This article was originally published in Business Punk.
